The great cathedrals of medieval Europe soared to such exalted
heights that it seemed nothing would stop them from becoming
taller, or wider, or more embellished with the finest artistry
the world had ever seen. But alas. It was a grand illusion
that could not continue, because the model it was built upon
was soon to fall into crisis.
The model was Christianity, then at the height of its power
upon the minds and thrones and purses of Europe. Christianity
at that point was in step one of the Kuhn Cycle: Normal Science.
That cycle has five distinct, predictable steps, as shown in
the diagram above.
As this essay will show, Christainity has
progressed through all five steps. But
when it comes to the sustainability problem, civilization
remains stuck in the Model Crisis step. The longer it
stays there the worse the problem will become. Understanding
how the Kuhn Cycle works is essential for discovering how
civilization can break free of the clutches of the Model
Crisis step and move on. It can move on to either the Model
Revolution step, which is historically frought with peril,
or it can bypass it altogether using the System Improvement
Process. The latter appears to be the only viable alternative
for solving the sustainability problem before catastrophe
becomes unavoidable.
The Kuhn Cycle was first described in The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions, a short book published in 1962.
In it Thomas Kuhn stunned the scientific community with the
theory that the history of science is not a slow, progressive,
evolutionary accumulation of knowledge. Instead, science
is continually undergoing what has come to be known as the
Kuhn Cycle, which works like this:
Introduction to
the Kuhn Cycle
Step
1: Normal Science - The Kuhn Cycle begins with Normal
Science, which is the normal way science sees the world.
Normal Science consists of a model that serves as a good
explanation or procedure for a large number of people.
Normal Science is the same thing as conventional wisdom and
social norms. A shining example is the role of religion in
most of the world. Up until recently it served as the reigning social
control model. (A social control model defines how a unit
of society works. The most fundamental unit is the family.)
While the villages, cities, states, and countries of early
Europe had their governments and armies, their power was subservient
to the church, whose word was supreme since it was the unquestioned
word of God.
Step
2: Model Drift - As people use a model more and
more, they soon start to discover its shortcomings. For scientific
models this occurs when phenomenon are observed that the
model cannot explain. For social control models this occurs
when procedures begin failing to achieve their intended results.
This means the model has drifted away from perfection. Things
the model cannot explain or procedures that mysteriously
fail are known as anomalies. Sometimes the model
can be patched up to eliminate an anomaly, and sometimes
not. If it is an ambitious model that seeks to explain or
control a lot, then model drift is inevitable.
Model Drift came to Christianity very early. Every time an
anomaly appeared, the dogma was patched up to accommodate it.
If prayer failed, for example, its failure was not due to any
weakness in religion. It was due to some shortcoming or unworthiness
on the part of the person doing the praying. Or if evidence
that a miracle had occurred or that God himself existed was
hard to come by, then faith rather than physical proof was
required on the part of the believer. The mantra of “You’ve
got to have faith” is an example of this.
Please note that this article is not an attack on religion,
but a sincere effort to show its strengths and weaknesses as
one of history’s most important social control models.
Religion has and still does provide many societies with crucial
components, such as morality, social networking, and helping
the disadvantaged.
As time went by the most serious sources of Model Drift came
from science. The earliest major source of drift was the discovery
of the rules of logic by Aristotle in 500BC. People could
now reason correctly for the first time. It did not take
them long to notice that religion was highly dependent on a
number of untestable, and hence unproven, hypotheses. But because
there were no other serious competing social control models
for them to turn to, religion reigned supreme for thousands
of years.
But according to Thomas Kuhn all major paradigms are subject
to the Kuhn Cycle, because our knowledge about the world is
never complete and our needs are forever changing. Christianity
was no exception. In 1543 the Copernican Revolution began to
overthrow one of Christianity’s more cherished and central
assertions: that the Earth was the orbital center of the universe.
But because the new heliocentric model (which placed the sun
in the center of the solar system) was based on arcane observations
by specialists, it languished and had little effect on the
masses. But that was to soon change abruptly.
Step
3: Model Crisis – If enough model drift occurs,
the model can no longer serve as a reliable guide. This throws
those using the model into crisis, because now they have
nothing to base rational decisions on. They are intellectually
lost when it comes to interpreting the world and deciding
how to solve problems, and are forced to either guess or
do nothing. This throws the world around them into crisis
because of poor decision making. As the model crisis grows,
new models are proposed that may or may not accommodate the
anomalies.
In December of 1610 Galileo turned his telescope to the heavens
and smashed the geocentric model forever, when he observed
that Venus went through the same phases the moon did. With
this strong visual proof, because anyone could now peer through
a telescope and see the truth for themselves, the old geocentric
model crumbled at last. It could not explain (or be extended
to explain) the phases of Venus, the revolution of moons around
Jupiter, the rotation of the sun, and so on. But a heliocentric
model, one with the sun at the center, could.
This ignited a Model Crisis. Galileo’s endorsement of
the new model greatly offended the Catholic Church. The church
argued that the new model contradicted the Bible, and warned
Galileo not to promote it. But truth has no higher master,
so Galileo continued anyway. In 1633 Galileo was tried by the
Catholic Inquisition and forced to recant under threat of torture,
imprisonment, and death on the stake. Always practical, he
recanted. Due to his old age and infirmities he got off with
house arrest for the rest of his life. But he had ignited a
spark that would not die.
Step
4: Model Revolution – Once it is clear the
old model cannot be patched up, the search for a new model
begins. This is revolutionary because it takes radical change
to conceive of the totally new ideas necessary to accommodate
all the accumulated anomalies. The Model Revolution step
can be quite tumultuous and prolonged. It can take years,
decades, or even centuries to arrive at a new model that
successfully integrates most of the anomalies into a new
acceptable model. The step ends when the new model is discovered.
In 1687 Sir Isaac Newton published what is probably the most
influential new model of all time: the Philosophiae Naturalis
Principia Mathematica. This work presented the three universal
laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation. This new
model of how the physical world really worked was so complete
and so well supported by the new laws and examples of their
application that the geocentric model, religious explanations,
and folk tales purporting to offer an explanation were soon
considered quaint relics of history within the halls of science.
But outside those halls was another story. Even though Model
Revolution had occurred, it would still take a long time for
the new paradigm to be widely accepted by laymen, because of
the power of the church over their minds.
That power, and the model behind it, suffered a gigantic blow
in 1859 when Charles Darwin published On the Origin of
Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation
of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. In one swift
stroke he demolished the biblical theory that plants and animals
were a divine creation, with the implication that Homo
sapiens himself was included. With this new model of how
living things had evolved and why they behaved the way they
did in their hands, scientists were no longer dependent on
religion for any explanations of the world. In science the
Model Revolution step was mostly over. But there was still
the rest of the world to win over, which required the next
step of the Kuhn Cycle.
Meanwhile, the new model of what would replace the power of
the church was growing by leaps and bounds. Up to about this
time governments had been lineages of royalty, punctuated by
violent struggles for power to start a new line of rulers.
The problem with this model was a new ruler tended to start
off benevolent, and so his subjects were happy. This Normal
Science step soon gave way to Model Drift, as the ruler invariably
began overtaxing, or waging wars that were unnecessary, or
the many ways that absolutists think more of themselves than
their subjects. This step in turn gave way to Model Crisis
when things got so bad the people knew they needed a new ruler,
but did not known how to go about putting one into power. Since
this could not be done by working within the established system,
Model Revolution was needed to boot the despot out and install
a new and hopefully better ruler.
In retrospect it was no surprise when the long smoldering
Model Crisis of the American colonies under the heavy handed
thumb of the British, and the French under the royal thumb
of King Louis XVI, led in quick succession to the American
Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789. As these
events showed, the more committed the old order is to the old
model, the more violent the Model Revolution step has to be
to succeed. These revolutions established the new model of
democracy. Also, around this time the new economic model of
free market commerce also appeared, exemplified by Adam Smith’s Wealth
of Nations in 1776. These two developments combined to
create the new model of free market democracy. But the new
model still had to spread, which required the next step of
the Kuhn Cycle.
Step
5: Paradigm Change – Once the innovators of
the Model Revolution step agree on a single new model, the
Paradigm Change step begins. Here the mental models of the
model users themselves must change, which is difficult. In
many cases it is impossible, so Paradigm Change is not complete
until many believers in the old model have died off and the
new model has been taught to the new generation.
By now the age of cathedrals, along with the age of religion,
was over. The new paradigm of free market democracy began to
replace the church in country after country as the dominant
social control model. Experimental variations appeared, such
as communism. But after about 100 to 200 years, the Paradigm
Change step was complete at the national level, though the
new model is still immature at the international level.
And finally in 1992 the Catholic Church issued a formal apology
and declared Galileo to be correct. The heliocentric model
was now Normal Science, even within the church.
The Next Cycle – The Kuhn Cycle is
complete when the new model is the normal way people look at
the world, and the old model is tossed on the rubbish heap
of history. The cycle then starts over again, because our knowledge
about the world is never complete.
The Central Hypotheses of the Book
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was
such an eye-opener that it became one of the most cited works
in scientific literature in the second half of the 20th century.
But the real beauty of the Kuhn Cycle is that it applies not
just to science, but to any body of knowledge whose use is
critical and whose construction is evolutionary. Thus it applies
to the model that civilization uses to run itself.
This leads to the central hypothesis of A Model in Crisis,
the working title of a book in progress. The hypothesis is
this:
The
model that civilization uses to run itself is in the Model
Crisis step of the Kuhn Cycle, because the model is no longer
capable of running civilization well.
This is a higher order abstraction than the normal one of
global unsustainability. The abstraction of the Kuhn Cycle
frames the global environmental sustainability problem as something
that is part of a predictable pattern of system behavior. Because
that pattern is so predictable, the Kuhn Cycle lets us see
that the next step is probably going to be Model Revolution.
This is to be avoided at all costs, because historically large
changes in social governance models take too long and are too
often accompanied by excessive amounts of violence, suffering,
and unpredictability.
Fortunately there is a better way. The distinguishing characteristic
of Homo sapiens (knowing man in Latin) is reason.
Why not use mankind’s greatest tool, reason, to cleverly
bypass the Model Revolution step, and arrive at the next step,
Paradigm Change, much more quickly and reliably?

This can be done by grafting the System Improvement Process
onto the Kuhn Cycle as shown, and then persuading civilization's
problem solvers to take the right fork in the road. This leads
to the second central hypothesis of the book:
The System Improvement Process is a satisfactory
way to avoid Model Revolution and arrive at the Paradigm
Change step, with a high probability of being able to proactively
solve the global environmental sustainability problem in
time.
The System Improvement Process is a simple, generic, highly
analytical process designed to apply to all types of complex
social system problems. It has the four main steps shown in
the diagram. These steps are so central to A Model in Crisis that
the four parts of the book are Getting Started, System Understanding,
Solution Convergence, and Implementation. The book has 23 chapters,
13 of which are done, including all of the most important.
The first step in the System Improvement Process is to formally
define the problem to be solved. This greatly focuses all subsequent
problem solving effort. The second step is to understand why
the system behaves the way it does so well that the third step,
converging on the solution, is relatively trivial. For this
to happen problem solvers should spend approximately 80% of
their time in the all important System Understanding step.
The fourth step implements the solution.
Six and one half billion people now stand at a momentous fork
in the road. One road leads from Model Crisis to Model Revolution.
This is the road Homo sapiens is hurtling along now,
because there is no global conception of the Kuhn Cycle abstraction,
and thus no fundamental realization that there is any other
way. But as A Model in Crisis argues, there is another
way.
Can the model civilization is using to run itself be repaired
in time, or will environmental overshoot cause our world to
collapse and come crashing down around us, like so many old
cathedrals and even the power of the Church ultimately did?
No one knows the answer to that question yet. But ever since
Aristotle discovered the basic laws of logic in 500 BC, which
allowed people to reason correctly for the first time,
we do know one thing for certain: Reason is mankind’s
greatest tool. Therefore if the sustainability problem can
be solved, the analytical application of reason is the fastest,
most reliable, and hence the best road forward.